Wisdom and Knowledge Series, post #4. Buddhism, post #2 (4.2.1):
My answer to a Yahoo! Answers question:
The question:
What is the best way to start a new life?
I am beginning, at the age of 33, to realize the err in my ways of life
(i.e., making poor ethical choices and living without regard to
self-discipline). My question is this: What is the best way for a
person to "begin anew"? I've been drawn to the teachings of Buddhism
and have considered joining a monastery. Have I lost my mind? I'm so
spiritually tired that I'm afraid I'm doomed. I've also been introduced
to the recovery community's philosophy of living "one day at a time,"
but it seems insufficient for creating a substantial rearrangement of
one's personal perception of what life is and how to live to achieve
happiness and fulfillment. I've also considered moving to another city,
including the city my grandparents lived in for many years during my
childhood. Can anyone offer any other ideas or suggestions based on
personal experience for a person to "change their way of life," and
"attain enlightenment," if you will?
My answer:
In Bhikkhu Bodhi's book "The Noble Eightfold Path", he says something like:
"For real security lies on the side of truth, not {something like
desired dreams or hopes; I can't remember the exact words after the word
'not', but I believe it to be something like what I just wrote
(something like desired dreams...)}"
Taking that as your basis, you start to look for truth.
But because you probably don't have the book ("The Noble Eightfold Path"
by Bhikkhu Bodhi), then you can start with this as a basis maybe,
because this is what I MAYBE believed when I was searching for an answer
those times that were before I saw that part in the book of Bhikkhu
Bodhi's: you start with the "belief-to-be-used-as-a-basis" that
everything connects with the truth: from the level of common life to the
highest levels of enlightenment, which are Arhatship, and then even
higher, to the highest level, which is Buddhahood (the Buddha of our
history is an example of Buddhahood). (But if you have the book, then
you can find the part in the book.)
What would be truth? For me, I am near-sighted, and when I don't wear my
glasses, things are of course "fuzzy" looking. and my mental makeup
makes it "confusing" when I look for the truth. I look around my room
and search for something I can really label without "confusion" to what
it is. Sometimes in my search it MAYBE could have been a body part --
leg, arm. I then make a statement (in my mind, not verbally I guess)
labelling what it is. For example: "arm?". There is a question mark
denoting I am not totally sure it is an arm?
And more so:
I am in (your city)... in (your country)...on this planet...revolving
around the sun...part of the solar system...part of the milky way
galaxy...part of the Local Group...part of the Virgo Supercluster
(that's if you believe it to be the truth, or even heard of them --
maybe you never looked at astronomy and heard our galaxy is part of the
Local Group of galaxies).
Then you may be aware of any bodily stress and/or inner mental stressful
feeling(s) (and/or thought(s)?), because that is the experience of
truth, as well? That's if you do experience any of that. Maybe you would
experience something different, like happiness, when you do this
exercise? Who knows. This is the first time I've communicated this deep,
hopefully to other living-breathing flesh-and-blood humans (it just
happens to be they/them reading on the internet) about my way of
searching for truth.
Then you can ask yourself any question, but you must give the true
answer to it. Give a true answer to the question -- if the question can
even be given a true answer -- or else don't even give an answer at all.
Why, as the second option, you do not need to give an answer at all?
Because if you don't give a reply, how could you communicate any
untruth? What does this mean? You are expected not to lie, so you don't
have to give any answer at all (as the second option you have).
Also here is a interesting idea with questioning:
Have you heard of the question 'What do I want?' ? Well, why don't you
ask this (deeper, if you can call it that) question: Do I want anything?
Or instead of 'Who am I?', ask 'Am I anyone?'
Instead of 'What am I?', ask 'Am I anything?'
Instead of 'What do I need?', you can ask 'Do I need anything?'
Then like I said already above, with any question, you either can answer
it -- but it has to be a truthful answer (if you can give whatever
certain question it is, even a truthful answer), or your second option
is not to answer at all, not to communicate a reply to your question --
this second option would be in perfect harmony with truth, because you
did not transgress the truth, because your argument for doing so could
be that you could not possibly lie if you did not communicate any reply
(to your own question). BUT YOU CAN ALWAYS THINK OF A REPLY, THINK OF
THE QUESTION, THINKING OF WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO REPLY WITH -- TRUE OR
NOT. BUT WHEN IT COMES TO SETTING FORTH A REPLY, YOU DO NOT HAVE TO
DETERMINE/COMMUNICATE ANY REPLY AT ALL (THIS WOULD BE YOUR SECOND OPTION
AS I SAID). This questioning and seeking for a reply is all done in
your mind, it is not done verbally -- though you can try verbally also,
and see how that works out...
That's all I will say for my search for truth.
And then there is Theravada Buddhism: Make your life. You are free to
choose. But even if you practice the below Majjhima Nikaya 61, you may
make mistakes that might hurt your health (like I did; where then I had
to heal back) -- because the Majjhima Nikaya 61 is just pointing out how
life works: people make mistakes sometimes. Hopefully you can foresee
any danger, and not do it, though (which Majjhima Nikaya 61 also says is
reality):
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.061.than.html
Source(s):
myself, Theravada buddhism
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110825183005AANDMT6